Perhaps its because I personally favor satirical forms of literature,
but I found Hedge’s article amusing.
That’s not to diminish the message he is trying to convey. In short, Hedge believes that the American
public is divided into two groups, the small, literate, and intellectual and
then the illiterate dipshits. Pardon the
language, but it really is the general description he provides. Our society, according to Hedge, is slowly
rotting away as we continue to find new ways to reduce the need to read, think
critically and engage actively.
He makes a brilliant point when he
shows that in recent years, presidential hopefuls have given speeches that are
at the reading level of a 7th grader. This is because it’s entertaining to the
masses, and easy to understand. But
there is no real substance to it.
Honesty and integrity are lost.
For Hedge, literacy is not just the ability to read something. Literacy is
the ability to read something that has purpose and power behind its words. It shouldn’t be substituted by
entertainment. Now, I will admit that I
find his perspective of the future to be too bleak. As his article was written in 2008 and it is
now 2013, I can say that while there are still many issues unanswered, things
are slowly progressing. We have a long
way to go, but it’s not the end all.
At the
start of Carr’s article he states that he has found himself, over the years,
losing the ability to maintain focus on a piece of literature. Something that came so easy to him years ago. This immediately resonated with me, for I
know that I am guilty of, after the first three pages, getting distracted and
having my mind shuffle between other thoughts.
Carr cites that a cause of this loss of attention lies within the Internet
and its ability to quickly and easily distribute information. Our society is a product of the web; we are
constantly on the move and no longer have the time nor patience to give our
attention to something longer than 10 minutes. It’s an unfortunate reality that even I
cannot ignore. This easily ties into
Hedge’s argument that the majority of the American people look only for entertainment,
not substance. Both Hedge and Carr
relate that the general public wants a simplified explanation, not an in depth
one. Carr does admit that because of the
introduction of texting and the Internet, we are reading more then ever
before. But it is this very idea that
Hedge is concerned with. In short, we
may be reading more today then ever before, but the old saying still holds
true: quality over quantity.
Evan, I really liked your analysis of both pieces and feel like you hit the main points spot on. Similar to you, I can also relate to the effects of the Internet and our fast paced society. It is always so tempting just to skim the surface of a topic in order to gain a general understanding rather than actually taking the time to go in depth with the meaning. Your quality over quantity point holds true in this case as well I believe. While both would be ideal, I feel like that is totally unrealistic for the majority of the population, and we must now understand the importance of an in depth understanding of current events.
ReplyDelete